RF325 Aero K - Flight Status

Which is the frequency of flight RF325?
The flight RF325 is scheduled to flight on daily basis.

Which is the distance of flight RF325?
The distance between the two airports is 1258 kilometers.

Which is the flight time of flight RF325?
The scheduled flight time gate to gate is: 03:10 hours.
The real flight time gate to gate on average is: 02:36 hours.

Are the departure airport and arrival airport at the same Time Zone?
Yes, both airports are in the same timezone.

The following airlines serves the same route between Tokyo and Seoul:

Jeju Air
- Flight Number: 7C1102. (On Time performance: 88 - Average Delay: 7 minutes)
- Flight Number: 7C1104. (On Time performance: 53 - Average Delay: 25 minutes)
- Flight Number: 7C1106. (On Time performance: 75 - Average Delay: 7 minutes)
- Flight Number: 7C1108. (On Time performance: 72 - Average Delay: 13 minutes)
- Flight Number: 7C1122. (On Time performance: 94 - Average Delay: 3 minutes)

Air Premia
- Flight Number: YP732. (On Time performance: 88 - Average Delay: 7 minutes)

Air Busan
- Flight Number: BX163. (On Time performance: 96 - Average Delay: 4 minutes)
- Flight Number: BX165. (On Time performance: 70 - Average Delay: 15 minutes)

Ethiopian Airlines
- Flight Number: ET673. (On Time performance: 85 - Average Delay: 5 minutes)

Korean Air
- Flight Number: KE704. (On Time performance: 66 - Average Delay: 19 minutes)
- Flight Number: KE706. (On Time performance: 93 - Average Delay: 5 minutes)
- Flight Number: KE712. (On Time performance: 84 - Average Delay: 6 minutes)
- Flight Number: KE714. (On Time performance: 83 - Average Delay: 9 minutes)

Jin Air
- Flight Number: LJ202. (On Time performance: 95 - Average Delay: 3 minutes)
- Flight Number: LJ206. (On Time performance: 53 - Average Delay: 26 minutes)
- Flight Number: LJ208. (On Time performance: 39 - Average Delay: 28 minutes)
- Flight Number: LJ218. (On Time performance: 88 - Average Delay: 6 minutes)

AirJapan
- Flight Number: NQ21. (On Time performance: 93 - Average Delay: 4 minutes)

Asiana Airlines
- Flight Number: OZ101. (On Time performance: 85 - Average Delay: 8 minutes)
- Flight Number: OZ103. (On Time performance: 93 - Average Delay: 4 minutes)
- Flight Number: OZ105. (On Time performance: 82 - Average Delay: 7 minutes)
- Flight Number: OZ107. (On Time performance: 79 - Average Delay: 10 minutes)
- Flight Number: OZ109. (On Time performance: 80 - Average Delay: 11 minutes)

Air Seoul
- Flight Number: RS702. (On Time performance: 61 - Average Delay: 42 minutes)
- Flight Number: RS704. (On Time performance: 42 - Average Delay: 36 minutes)
- Flight Number: RS706. (On Time performance: 77 - Average Delay: 16 minutes)

T'way Air
- Flight Number: TW212. (On Time performance: 92 - Average Delay: 5 minutes)
- Flight Number: TW214. (On Time performance: 91 - Average Delay: 6 minutes)
- Flight Number: TW216. (On Time performance: 65 - Average Delay: 14 minutes)

Eastar Jet
- Flight Number: ZE602. (On Time performance: 88 - Average Delay: 11 minutes)
- Flight Number: ZE604. (On Time performance: 48 - Average Delay: 23 minutes)
- Flight Number: ZE606. (On Time performance: 96 - Average Delay: 2 minutes)
- Flight Number: ZE608. (On Time performance: 75 - Average Delay: 24 minutes)

Zipair Tokyo
- Flight Number: ZG41. (On Time performance: 93 - Average Delay: 3 minutes)

We have gathered data from recent months and present below an analysis of how timely the flights have been.

Delays analyzed by Weekday: We have gathered available data from last six months, spanning from May 30, 2024 to November 27, 2024. Next, you can observe the results broken down by day of the week: number of flights analyzed, on-time performance per day, and average delay per day.

Delays analyzed by Month: We have gathered available data from last twelve closed months, spanning from May 30, 2024 to October 31, 2024. Next, you can observe the results broken down by month: number of flights analyzed, on-time performance per month, and average delay per month.

Note: We have excluded some months from the graph, since the quantity and quality of the data is not representative enough.